1.
The idea that most surprised me when reading
Chapter 1: Entrepreneurship: Evolutionary Development- Revolutionary Impact was
the myth presented that “Entrepreneurs Are Born, Not Made”. In my mind I have
never even considered the idea that anyone could think that entrepreneurship is
an innate ability, as the definition of entrepreneurship almost implies that it
is something that must be learned through experience. Some people believe that there must be an
innate ability to take risks to be an entrepreneur but I have never seen this
to be true. It is the same ability to
take risks that all humans have, however the best entrepreneurs learn to mix
this riskiness with unique ideas.
2.
The most confusing part of the reading for me
was the Displacement School of Thought. In my view, this school of thought is
based off of the actions of the few, because I believe that working as a group
is one of the main keys towards implementing an idea in the real world. I might be understanding it incorrectly but I
don’t believe that displacement factors are the main form of making entrepreneurial
ventures. Although I think it increases the number of ventures, it creates
ventures that either fail because they are poorly conceived or they don’t grow
much because of limitations.
3.
One question I would ask the author is, Is
America the best place to start a Gazelle because of the free trade agreements
and capitalist economy? Another question I would ask is which approach to
entrepreneurship do you find yourself most in line with?
4.
The only thing that I questioned is the Entrepreneurial
Revolution the author mentions. I don’t believe
that entrepreneurship will be any more important than it has always been, but
as technology increases, it will be easier to document any sort of
entrepreneurial ventures. The population
of the earth is growing as a whole, but I do not think that entrepreneurship is
growing in percentage, rather that it is changing form.
No comments:
Post a Comment